28 February 2011

1 record, 2 centuries, 18 wickets, 676 runs – and a tie(IND vs ENG)

Bangalore: Andrew Strauss conjured one of the greatest innings in World Cup history after Sachin Tendulkar's master-class as England, pursuing a daunting 339, achieved a sensational tie here on Sunday.
The humdinger at the Chinnaswamy Stadium hurtled to pulse-pounding conclusion. England required 14 with two wickets remaining from the last over of this explosive Group ‘B' encounter.
Amidst tension and suspense, Graeme Swann collected a brace off the first delivery from seamer Munaf Patel and then took a single. Situations throw up heroes and Ajmal Shamshad blasted the third ball for a six between the straight field and long-on.
With Swann giving a start, the batsmen completed a quick bye from the fourth delivery. Swann then inside-edged Munaf for a couple and ran a single off the final delivery. What a finish!
In the 49th over, Swann had swept leg-spinner Piyush Chawla for the maximum. Then Tim Bresnan, who scalped five earlier in the day with telling yorkers and clever changes of pace at the death, biffed Chawla for a six over mid-wicket.
Chawla, who conceded 15 runs in that over, castled Bresenan with a quicker one off the last ball but England now was within striking distance.
Eventually, Strauss's heroic 145-ball 158 did not go in vain. The England captain, who lived a dream in the cauldron, was adjudged Man of the Match. This was the fourth tie in the World Cup and the two sides picked a point each.
On a belter of a track, the bowling limitations of both the sides had been exposed. The batsmen were not complaining.
In the afternoon, Sachin Tendulkar had held centre-stage with an ethereal 115-ball 120 — this was the maestro's 47th ODI century. Tendulkar, with five, has the most World Cup hundreds now.
Then Strauss took control. His innings was of the blood and guts kind. The England captain was not bothered by the pressures of the chase and remained undaunted by adversity.
The left-hander's fluency in stroke-making — he was exceptional square off the wicket on either side and flicked with panache — and his commitment shone through in an exceptional innings.
India would rue the lapse when Harbhajan Singh floored a tough chance at mid-on. Strauss was on 22 then and Munaf was the bowler to suffer.
Strauss and the determined Ian Bell — the left-right pair put on 170 for the third wicket — seemed to take the game away from India.
Zaheer strikes
Zaheer Khan struck in the nick of time. Taken apart by Kevin Pietersen in his first spell, the crafty left-arm paceman delivered two vital blows in the 43rd over; also the first over of the batting Power Play.
Bell (69) was held at mid-off and then a scorching yorker ended Strauss's tenure. Not much later, Paul Collingwood was done in by Zaheer's clever change of pace. It was advantage India, but England scripted an escape.
Not without drama
The gripping contest was not without drama. When on 17, Bell charging down was beaten on the sweep by Yuvraj Singh's left-arm spin. Umpire Bille Bowden ruled not out.
India asked for a referral. Although the replays showed the ball hitting the off-stump, Bowden's decision stood since the law stipulates that if the point of impact is more than two and a half metres from the stumps the standing umpire's decision cannot be reversed.
In the initial overs, Pietersen blitzed a rapid 31 before being spectacularly held by bowler Munaf Patel on his second attempt. Jonathan Trott played across to Chawla to be adjudged leg-before.
Earlier, Tendulkar's brush strokes painted the arena. A particular stroke off paceman Jimmy Anderson stood out. This was a maestro's legerdemain.
Anderson had a cover, a mid-off and a sweeper cover, yet Sachin Tendulkar bisected the field with exquisite timing and placement to find the cover fence.
On view was a heady amalgam of footwork, balance and last-minute adjustment of hand and wrists as the ball was driven through the slender gap, past desperately diving fielders.
Years fall away when Tendulkar finds his batting rhythm; he ruthlessly dismissed Swann and Collingwood beyond the ropes.
An England attack without the indisposed Stuart Broad narrowed its horizons after India elected to bat. Apart from the tireless Tim Bresnen, the attack suffered.
The script might have different had England struck off the first ball. With static feet, Sehwag followed an James Anderson delivery deviating away but Graeme Swann could not cling on to a tough offering at second slip.
Sehwag lived dangerously before attempting to glide a Bresnan delivery for 'keeper Matthew Prior to hold a fine diving catch to his right.
The right-left combination of Tendulkar and a fleet-footed Gautam Gambhir (51) raised 134 for the second wicket.
Yuvraj Singh, rightly promoted up the order, essayed a few booming blows, driving, pulling and lofting the bowlers for a well-made 50-ball 58.
Dhoni came up an entertaining 32 but India, going for quick runs, lost wickets in the end overs.
Finally, the crowd witnessed a thriller of an extraordinary kind.
SCOREBOARD
India: V. Sehwag c Prior b Bresnan 35 (26b, 6x4), S. Tendulkar c Yardy b Anderson 120 (115b, 10x4, 5x6), G. Gambhir b Swann 51 (61b, 5x4), Yuvraj c Bell b Yardy 58 (50b, 9x4), M.S. Dhoni c (sub) Wright b Bresnan 31 (25b, 3x4, 1x6), Y. Pathan c Swann b Bresnan 14 (8b, 1x4, 1x6), V. Kohli b Bresnan 8 (5b, 1x4), Harbhajan lbw b Bresnan 0 (1b), Zaheer (run out) 4 (5b), P. Chawla (run out) 2 (4b), M. Patel (not out) 0 (0b); Extras (lb-3, w-7, nb-5): 15; Total (in 49.5 overs): 338.
Fall of wickets: 1-46 (Sehwag), 2-180 (Gambhir), 3-236 (Tendulkar), 4-305 (Yuvraj), 5-305 (Dhoni), 6-327 (Pathan), 7-327 (Kohli), 8-328 (Harbhajan), 9-338 (Chawla).
England bowling: Anderson 9.5-0-91-1, Shahzad 8-0-53-0, Bresnan 10-1-48-5, Swann 9-1-59-1, Collingwood 3-0-20-0, Yardy 10-0-64-1.
England: A. Strauss lbw b Zaheer 158 (145b, 18x4, 1x6), K. Pietersen c & b Munaf 31 (22b, 5x4), J. Trott lbw b Chawla 16 (19b, 1x4), I. Bell c Kohli b Zaheer 69 (71b, 4x4, 1x6), P. Collingwood b Zaheer 1 (5b), M. Prior c (sub) Raina b Harbhajan 4 (8b), M. Yardy c Sehwag b Munaf 13 (10b, 1x4), T. Bresnan b Chawla 14 (9b, 1x6), G. Swann (not out) 15 (9b, 1x6), A. Shahzad (not out) 6 (2b, 1x6); Extras (b-1, lb-7, w-3): 11; Total (for eight wkts. in 50 overs): 338.
Fall of wickets: 1-68 (Pietersen), 2-111 (Trott), 3-281 (Bell), 4-281 (Strauss), 5-285 (Collingwood), 6-289 (Prior), 7-307 (Yardy), 8-325 (Bresnan).
India bowling: Zaheer 10-0-64-3, Munaf 10-0-70-2, Chawla 10-0-71-2, Harbhajan 10-0-58-1, Yuvraj 7-0-46-0, Pathan 3-0-21-0.

'Shane Warne a genius to have predicted India vs England tie'

He was a genius with the ball and England captain Andrew Strauss said Shane Warne proved as much a genius with predictions by correctly forecasting that the pulsating India-England match would end in a tie even before the players had walked out on the field.
"I think Warne is a genius to have predicted that way (a tie). What more can I say," said Strauss after the nerve-wrecking encounter in which his team was set a mammoth 339-run target by the Indians.
Riding on Strauss' magnificent 158, the Englishmen ended the match even-stevens to snatch a point.
But much before even the first ball was bowled, Warne had predicted on his twitter page that the match would be a tie.
"Looking forward to the game between India and England today should be a cracker. My prediction - a tie!"
Soon after the thriller, Warne posted another tweet in which he said, "Before u think there was something untoward re prediction of a tie, thought it was going to be a cracker - tie was tongue in cheek - but right."


83rd Academy Awards - List of Winners

Following is a compete list of winners at the 83rd annual Academy Awards in Hollywood on Sunday:

- Best Picture - The King's Speech

- Best Director - The King's Speech (Tom Hooper)

- Best Actor - Colin Firth (The King's Speech)

- Best Actress - Natalie Portman (Black Swan)

- Supporting Actor - Christian Bale (The Fighter)

- Supporting Actress - Melissa Leo (The Fighter)

- Original Screenplay - The King's Speech (David Seidler)

- Adapted Screenplay - The Social Network (Aaron Sorkin)

- Foreign Language Film - In a Better World (Denmark)

- Animated Feature - Toy Story 3

- Original Song - We Belong Together from Toy Story 3 (Randy Newman)

- Original Score - The Social Network (Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross)

- Film editing - The Social Network (Angus Wall, Kirk Baxter)

- Cinematography - Inception (Wally Pfister)

- Sound Mixing - Inception (Lora Hirschberg, Gary A. Rizzo, Ed Novick)

- Sound editing - Inception (Richard King)

- Visual effects - Inception (Paul Franklin, Chris Corbould, Andrew Lockley, Peter Bebb)

- Art direction - Alice in Wonderland (Robert Stromberg, Karen O'Hara)

- Costume design - Alice in Wonderland (Colleen Atwood)

- Makeup - The Wolfman (Rick Baker, Dave Elsey)

- Documentary feature - Inside Job

- Documentary short subject - Strangers No More

- Live action short film - God of Love

- Animated short film - The Lost Thing

83rd Academy Award Review


“The King’s Speech” has been crowned best picture at the 83rd Academy Awards ceremony as precise as a state coronation, the monarchy drama leading as expected with four Oscars and predictable favourites claiming acting honors.

Colin Firth as stammering British ruler George VI in “The King’s Speech” earned the best actor prize Sunday, while Natalie Portman won best actress as a delusional ballerina in “Black Swan.”

The boxing drama “The Fighter” claimed both supporting acting honors, for Christian Bale as a boxer turned-drug-abuser and Melissa Leo as a boxing clan’s domineering matriarch.



“The King’s Speech” also won the directing prize for Tom Hooper and the original-screenplay Oscar for David Seidler, a boyhood stutterer himself.

British-born Hooper, a relative big-screen newcomer best known for classy TV drama, took the industry’s top filmmaking prize Sunday over Hollywood veteran David Fincher, who had been a strong prospect for his Facebook drama “The Social Network.”

Bale, Leo win supporting Oscars

Christian Bale and Melissa Leo won the supporting-acting Academy Awards for the boxing drama “The Fighter,” while “Toy Story 3” claimed the prize for feature animation.

Leo’s win capped an unusual career surge in middle age for the 50-year-old actress, who had moderate success on TV’s “Homicide- Life on the Street” in her 30s but leaped to big-screen stardom in her late 40s, a time when most actresses find good roles hard to come by.

In disbelief when she took the stage, Leo said, “Pinch me.” Hollywood legend Kirk Douglas, who presented her award, obliged with a little pinch on her arm.

Bale, who is English, earned the same prize his Batman co-star, the late Heath Ledger, received posthumously two years ago for “The Dark Knight.” At the time, Bale had fondly recalled a bit of professional envy as he watched Ledger perform on set like a whirlwind as the diabolical Joker while the film’s star had to remain clenched up as the stoic, tightly wound Batman.

“The Fighter” gave Bale his turn to unleash some demons as Dicky Eklund, a boxer whose career unraveled amid crime and drug abuse. Bale delivers a showy performance full of tics and tremors, bobbing and weaving around the movie’s star and producer, Mark Wahlberg, who plays Eklund’s stolid brother, boxer Micky Ward.

Best original screenplay

Best-picture front-runner “The King’s Speech,” a tale of Britain’s stammering King George VI that led contenders with 12 nominations, won only one of the first nine prizes for which it was competing, best original screenplay for British writer David Seidler.

The win capped a lifelong dream for Seidler, a boyhood stutterer born in London in 1937, a year after George took the throne. Seidler, who overcame his own stutter at age 16, had long vowed to one day write about the monarch whose fortitude set an example for him in childhood.

The Oscar for adapted screenplay went to Aaron Sorkin for “The Social Network,” a chronicle of the birth of Facebook based on Ben Mezrich’s book “The Accidental Billionaires.” “The Social Network” also won for musical score for Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, and for film editing.

'Inception' claims four Oscars

The sci-fi blockbuster “Inception,” which came in with eight nominations, led with four wins, for visual effects, cinematography, sound editing and sound mixing.

“Inside Job,” an exploration of the 2008 economic meltdown, won for best documentary, which proved an uncommonly lively category this time.

The Oscar buildup featured speculation about whether Banksy, a mystery man of the street-art world, might show up for his awards entry, “Exit Through the Gift Shop.” If he was at the Oscars, he did not declare himself.






But it was the topic on most people’s minds the last two years, the economy, that resonated among Oscar voters. “Inside Job” director Charles Ferguson subjected Wall Street players, economists and bureaucrats to a fierce cross-examination to depict the economic crisis as a colossal crime perpetrated on the working-class masses by a greedy few.

“Forgive me, I must start by pointing out that three years after our horrific financial crisis caused by financial fraud, not a single financial executive has gone to jail, and that’s wrong,” Ferguson said.

While “The King’s Speech” came in as the best-picture favorite, “The Social Network” was considered a potent prospect for an upset win.

The two films have led a strong and varied field of best—picture contenders since they debuted nearly six months ago. “The Social Network” was the early leader, grabbing key critics’ honors and winning best drama at the Golden Globes. Momentum shifted to “The King’s Speech” as the film dominated on Oscar nominations morning and swept top awards from influential actors, directors and producers guilds.

Best animated feature

“Toy Story 3,” last year’s top-grossing release and a contender for best picture, won the fourth-straight animated-feature Oscar for Disney’s Pixar Animation unit. Pixar has produced six of the 10 Oscar recipients for animation since the category was added, including “Finding Nemo,” “WALL-E” and last year’s winner, “Up.”

Best foreign language film

The Oscar for foreign-language film went to Danish filmmaker Susanne Bier’s “In a Better World,” a saga of two broken families that centers on two teenage boys struggling with violence at school and plotting revenge.

The Lewis Carroll update “Alice in Wonderland” won the first prize of the night, claiming the art direction Oscar. It also won for costume design.

The show opened as co-hosts Anne Hathaway and James Franco inserted into a montage of scenes from best-picture nominees, built as a series of dream sequences reminiscent of “Inception.” The footage included such guests as Morgan Freeman and last year’s Oscar co-host Alec Baldwin.

27 February 2011

4 Rules to Win Your Oscar Pool

1. By far the best predictors are the winners of other major awards, like the Golden Globes. That isn’t rocket science, I know. But there is some utility in knowing which awards have the best track records in which categories. In the best picture category, for instance, awards given out by ‘outsiders’ like critics tend to be far less reliable predictors than those given out by professionals like directors and producers.

2. A nomination for best picture is a boon in the other categories. If one nominee for best actress appears in an Oscar-nominated film and another does not, the one in the nominated film is more likely to win. Unfortunately, now that 10 rather than five movies are nominated for Best Picture, this state of affairs is less likely to happen.

3. The Academy — which can take itself very seriously — is relatively unfriendly toward comedies. If two candidates otherwise seem tied, lean toward the more dramatic film. The exception is in the supporting actor and actress categories, where the Academy likes to have a bit more fun and playing comedic or otherwise quirky and offbeat roles may actually be an advantage.

4. Hollywood has some tendency to “spread the wealth” — generally, it hurts a nominee’s chances if she’s won in her category before. The converse is also somewhat true — if someone has been nominated a lot but has not won, they may build up some sympathy points. This is not absolute, however — otherwise, Meryl Streep would not have been shut out in her last 11 best actress nominations.

The New York Times (blog)

Pakistan wins a thrilling match Against Sri Lanka


COLOMBO: Living up to its description of ‘dark horse' for winning the tournament, Pakistan subdued Sri Lanka in its Group A match in the ICC World Cup here.
The team, which was supposed to be reeling under the loss of its four main players to an ICC ban, and which has not figured in many lists of teams billed to make the semifinals, served notice of its intentions on Saturday, with a fine display of batting and bowling.
Of course, not one fielder hit the stumps from anywhere on the field — and this might as well be a record in modern day ODI cricket — but then, that's the way the Pakistani team is.
Chasing 278 for a win under the notorious Premadasa lights, the opening Sri Lankan pair of Upul Tharanga and Thillakaratne Dilshan put on 76 for the first wicket before a diving Afridi held on to a catch offered by Tharanga. Offie Mohammad Hafeez had tossed one up and Tharanga drove him on the up.
Afridi steps up
Then, captain Afridi reminded everyone once again that he can deliver with the ball too, bowling a tidy line and length. Dilshan tried to cut one on the stumps, but the ball was too close. Dilshan missed, and glanced back to see the bails of his off stump missing. Afridi came back much later and had Sangakkara taking chances against him because the asking run rate had climbed to eight-plus. It was only a matter of time before Sangakkara holed out to Ahmed Shehzad at long on, becoming Afridi's 300th ODI wicket.
In another clever move, Afridi brought back Shoaib Akhtar in the 19 {+t} {+h} over. Shoaib crashed one through the defences of Jayawardena in the next over. Jayawardena was driving outside the line prompting Shoaib to spread his arms and do a slow run, his trade-mark aeroplane celebration.
This is around the time when Sri Lanka lost the plot. It seemed like a procession had begun when Thilan Samaraweera walked in and out in quick time, but Chamara Silva provided the support that Sangakkara looked for. Kamran Akmal had a torrid day behind the wicket and missed at least two stumping chances — and the beneficiary both times was Sangakkara, first when he was on 22 and then, on 33.
The bowler was Abdur Rehman. Then Rehman joined the League of Extraordinarily Bad Fielders, a club that has many members from Pakistan, when he dropped a sitter offered by Chamara Silva at mid-wicket.
The Sri Lankans' 50 came in 67 balls and the 100 in 135 balls. But it kept losing wickets at regular intervals and at the end of 40 overs, was at a hopeless 178 for 5 from where an assault on the target looked difficult.
Competitive total
Earlier, a patient 72 from Younis Khan and his century partnership with Misbah-ul-Haq (83), propelled Pakistan to a competitive total against Sri Lanka. In two matches, the pair has saved Pakistan the blushes a second time.
Before the start of the game Pakistan captain Afridi said that 270 would be a good total. The team got him a little over that.
Openers Hafeez and Ahmed Shehzad looked better than they did in the first match, though Shehzad exhibited some nerves, slashing and missing a few times. Shehzad's (13) first scoring stroke was a slash outside off-stump, to a ball that was pitched up, in the second over of the match. The ball sailed through where second slip would have been. Sri Lanka, strangely defensive, started with just one slip and soon after the slash, moved Mahela Jayawardena to second slip. The miss did not prove costly as Shehzad nicked attempting to drive Thisara Perara, who pitched one a shade short of good length. Sangakkara took a regulation catch.
After Shehzad's departure, it was left to Hafeez (32) to take the attack to the opposition camp. Gone was the sluggishness of the opening match. At the end of 10 overs, Pakistan had raced to 65.
The Hafeez-Kamran (39) pair — which first came together in last September's series against England and was successful till Kamran was dropped from the side — was on cruise mode, putting on 48 off 38 balls. But then, a misunderstanding cut short the best phase of the Pakistani innings — Kamran thought there was a single when Hafeez turned Muttiah Muralitharan's first ball of his first spell to short fine-leg.
But Hafeez, strangely, did not respond and both batsmen ended up at the same end. The throw to Muralitharan's end was long, but then it hardly mattered. Hafeez, had already given up. After Hafeez's fall, there was a slump in the run rate for some time as caution was preferred to adventure.
Sangakkara's record
Then suddenly Kamran woke up and wanted to hoist Rangana Herath. The first part of his idea worked: he stepped out and heaved. The ball dipped and turned away from him, giving Sangakkara the chance to become the wicket-keeper with the most stumpings in World Cup cricket.
The exit of Kamran brought Misbah and Younis together. They took time to settle down and, then began a phase of consolidation in singles and twos. This meant that the next fifty took another 10 overs, but, importantly, no wickets were lost. The 200 came up at roughly the same pace, in 38.3 overs.
The duo brought up the 50-run partnership in 59 balls; 100 runs in 113 balls. Younis (72) compiled the first 50 of the match in 56 balls and Misbah followed him. Younis perished trying to accelerate; his intended sweep off Herath ending up as a top edge and went in slow motion even as short fine-leg closed in. Afridi added some late flourish.
Sri Lanka was without the services of Lasith Malinga, who was clearly not comfortable bowling at the nets on Friday. “We are not going to take any risk with Malinga right now,” captain Sangakkara said. The team chose Chamara Silva over Charama Kapugedera. There was some discussion on the need to take Ajantha Mendis in the eleven, since Pakistan had not played him much, but Herath got the nod ahead of Mendis. Pakistan went in with the same 11 that played against Kenya.
Pakistan:
A. Shehzad c Sangakkara b Perera 13 ( 23b, 2x4),
M. Hafeez (run out) 32 ( 31b, 4x4, 1x6),
Kamran st Sangakkara b Herath 39 ( 48b, 5x4),
Younis c Jayawardene b Herath 72 ( 76b, 4x4),
Misbah-ul-Haq (not out) 83 ( 91b, 6x4),
U. Akmal c Dilshan b Muralitharan 10 ( 15b, 1x4),
S. Afridi c Dilshan b Mathews 16 ( 12b, 3x4),
A. Razzaq c (sub) Kapugedera b Perera 3 ( 4b);
Extras (lb-4, w-5): 9;
Total (for seven in 50 overs): 277.
Fall of wickets: 1-28, 2-76, 3-105, 4-213, 5-238, 6-267, 7-277.
Sri Lanka bowling:
Kulasekara 10-1-64-0,
Perera 9-0-62-2,
Mathews 10-0-56-1,
Muralitharan 10-0-35-1,
Herath 10-0-46-2,
Dilshan 1-0-10-0.
Sri Lanka:
U. Tharanga c Afridi b Hafeez 33 ( 43b, 6x4),
T. Dilshan b Afridi 41 ( 55b, 5x4).
K. Sangakkara c Shehzad b Afridi 49 ( 61b, 2x4, 1x6),
M. Jayawardene b Akhtar 2 ( 10b),
T. Samaraweera st. Kamran b Afridi 1 ( 4b),
C. Silva st. Kamran b Rehman 57 ( 78b, 5x4),
A. Mathews c Shehzad b Afridi 18 ( 20b, 2x4),
T. Perara b Akhtar 8 ( 6b, 1x4),
N. Kulasekara c Umar b Gul 24 ( 14b, 2x4, 1x6),
R. Herath (not out) 4 ( 10b),
M. Muralitharan (not out) 0 ( 1b);
Extras (b-1, lb-10, w-16, nb-2): 29;
Total (for nine wickets in 50 overs) 266.
Fall of wickets: 1-76, 2-88, 3-95, 4-96, 5-169, 6-209, 7-232, 8-233, 9-265.
Pakistan bowling:
Akhtar 10-0-42-2,
Razzaq 5-1-23-0,
Gul 9-0-60-1,
Hafeez 6-0-33-1,
Afridi 10-0-34-4,
Rehman 10-1-63-1.
Man-of-the-Match:
Shahid Afridi (Pakistan) .

`Black Swan' wins top honor at indie Spirit Awards


The ballet thriller "Black Swan" won four prizes Saturday at the Spirit Awards honoring independent film, including best picture, best actress for Natalie Portman and director for Darren Aronofsky.

James Franco was picked as best actor for the survival story "127 hours," while the Ozarks crime story "Winter's Bone" earned both supporting-acting prizes, for John Hawkes and Dale Dickey.

All three films are up for best picture at Sunday's Academy Awards, where Portman is considered the favorite to win the best-actress Oscar and Franco is a co-host alongside actress Anne Hathaway.

With plenty of overlap among nominees at the Oscars, the Spirit Awards are a warm-up for Hollywood's biggest party.

The British monarchy saga "The King's Speech," the best-picture front-runner at the Oscars, won the prize for best foreign film.

"Black Swan" also took the cinematography award for Matthew Libatique.

Portman and Aronofsky joked about the difficulty in getting "Black Swan" off the ground, with cash tight and few people believing the film could ever make its money back.

"My ballet teachers were, like, every day, `So when do we get paid?'" said Portman, who won for her role as a ballerina losing her grip on reality.

Aronofsky thanked his financial backers for believing in the film. "Now, they're (expletive) rich," Aronofsky said of the money men behind "Black Swan," a $100 million hit.

Aronofsky said he has been blessed with fearless actors in all of his films and had gushing praise for Portman.

"To have this incredible performer give you everything she's got and then train for a year. I'll always be in debt to Miss Natalie Portman," Aronofsky said.

Franco, in film school at New York University when the "127 hours" script came his way, said he was inclined to pass except for the insistence of his manager, agent and publicist, who told him it was a film he had to do.

"I just finished my thesis film, so independent film is something that's a very, very big part of my life and very important to me, so this means a lot," said Franco, who stars as real-life adventurer Aron Ralston, who cut off his arm after he became trapped by a boulder in a canyon.

"The King's Speech" director, Tom Hooper, said he has not been following Oscar predictions but confided backstage that he was jittery about the awards show coming a day later.

"I think anyone would be not in their right mind at the prospect of making a speech in front of half a billion people," Hooper said.

"Winter's Bone" co-star Hawkes thanked the film's crew, advising the crowd to "look them up and hire them for your films." He also thanked director Debra Granik, whom he called the "best of the best," and the break-out star of "Winter's Bone," Jennifer Lawrence, who lost best actress to Portman but also is nominated at the Oscars.

"I can't wait to see what the future holds for you, Jen," said Hawkes, who plays Lawrence's menacing but ferociously protective uncle.

In "Winter's Bone," Dickey co-stars as a member of a close-knit crime clan in the Ozarks. She thanked the people of Missouri, where the film was shot, for opening "their hearts and land," and said she hoped the role might land her fresh work.

"I'm getting some more auditions than I had before," said Dickey, best-known for her comic role as the daytime hooker on TV's "My Name Is Earl." "The residual trickle-down is hopefully, I'll get more work. If I get more work, I'm a happy chick."

The graffiti-art examination "Exit Through the Gift Shop" won the documentary prize, for which it also was in the running at the Oscars. Elusive British street artist Banksy, the film's director who keeps his identity secret, was not in sight.

Thierry Guetta, a Frenchman who appears in the film and is part of the street-art movement, accepted the award and was asked the inevitable question backstage: Where's Banksy?

"I don't know. Maybe somewhere here," Guetta said, and speculated about whether Banksy might turn up at the Oscars. "Tomorrow is another day. Maybe he's somewhere around. Maybe he's sitting next to you, not too far away."

The lesbian-family tale "The Kids Are All Right" took the screenplay award for Stuart Blumberg and Lisa Cholodenko, who are nominated for best original screenplay at the Oscars.

The backwoods funeral tale "Get Low," starring Robert Duvall, Bill Murray and Sissy Spacek, won for best film from a first-time director, Aaron Schneider.

Other Spirit Award winners included:

• First screenplay: Lena Dunham, "Tiny Furniture."

• John Cassavetes Award for best film made for under $500,000: "Daddy Longlegs."

• Robert Altman Award for director, casting director and ensemble cast: "Please Give."

`Last Airbender' Won Worst Picture Award 2010


LOS ANGELES - The action fantasy "The Last Airbender" — about people who can command fire, air, water and earth — now controls something else: the Razzie awards for Hollywood's worst film achievements of 2010.

"The Last Airbender" led Saturday's Razzies with five awards, among them worst picture, worst director and worst screenplay for M. Night Shyamalan.

The movie also received Razzies for worst supporting actor (Jackson Rathbone, who was cited for both "The Last Airbender" and "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse") and for a special award, worst eye-gouging misuse of 3-D.

A spoof of the Academy Awards, the Razzies were announced the night before the Oscars, Hollywood's biggest party.

"Sex and the City 2" took three Razzies, including worst actress, a prize shared by co-stars Sarah Jessica Parker, Kim Cattrall, Kristin Davis and Cynthia Nixon, worst screen couple or ensemble for its entire cast, and worst prequel, remake, rip-off or sequel.

Ashton Kutcher was picked as worst actor for "Killers" and "Valentine's Day," while Jessica Alba took the Razzie as worst supporting actress for four 2010 releases, "The Killer Inside Me," "Little Fockers," "Machete" and "Valentine's Day."

Shyamalan has been on a downward spiral since 1999 Oscar best-picture contender "The Sixth Sense," which earned him directing and writing nominations at Hollywood's highest honors. He won Razzies as worst director and worst supporting actor for his 2006 fantasy flop "Lady in the Water."

Despite terrible reviews, "The Last Airbender" managed to find a decent audience, pulling in $300 million worldwide at the box office. Shyamalan adapted the movie from the animated TV series "Avatar: The Last Airbender."

"He managed to take a cartoon property and make it even less lifelike by making it with real actors," said Razzies founder John Wilson. "Most people who like the show, and this would include my 14-year-old son, hated the movie. It made no sense whatsoever."

"The Last Airbender" was among movies that critics knocked for smudgy, blurry 3-D images. The movie was shot in 2-D and converted to digital 3-D to cash in on the extra few dollars theaters charge for 3-D screenings.

"They call it converted. We call it perverted," Wilson said. "The more times you trick the public and charge them that fee and don't really deliver, eventually it's going to be like Lucy and Charlie Brown with the football. Fool me ten times, I'm done."

Wilson said the characters of "Sex and the City 2" were getting too old to cavort the way they do, calling the movie "`The Expendables,' but with estrogen," referring to Sylvester Stallone's tale about aging action heroes.

"Sex and the City 2" also was offensive, Wilson said, showing Parker and her gal pal co-stars disrespecting Arab culture on a trip to Abu Dhabi and flaunting their privileged ways.

"It was released in the middle of a period of American history when everyone's scrounging not to lose their homes, and these women are riding around in Rolls-Royces, buying expensive shoes and just throwing money around like they're drunk," Wilson said.

24 February 2011

England vs Netherlands, 5th ODI :Cricket WC


In the closely fought match between England and Netherlands, England have come out victorious getting past the formidable Dutch total of 292 in the 49th over.
England have won the match by 6 wickets but credit must be given to Netherlands for putting up a solid show. Contrary to the last day matches between Australia and Zimbabwe or that featuring New Zealand and Kenya or the one between Sri Lanka and Canada which were one-sided affairs, today’s match was thrilling and competitive.
Batting first, Netherlands amassed a massive-looking 292/6 riding on the century of Ryan ten Doeschate (119). Dutch batsmen like Doeschate, Peter Borren (35) and Wesley Barresi (29) hit the English bowlers, particularly James Anderson, all over the park.
Chasing the Dutch total of 292, England needed a good start and that’s exactly what openers Kevin Pietersen (39) and Andrew Strauss (88) provided. Dutch bowlers bowled mostly medium pace deliveries and the experience of the English batsmen helped them ease nerves.
Jonathan Trott (62) and Ian Bell (33) provided solidarity in the middle overs and never allowed the Netherlands to cut through. Dutch skipper Peter Borren smelled blood when the 4th English wicket fell on 241 but thereafter veteran Paul Collingwood (30) and talented Ravi Bopara (30) saw the team through.
Result: England defeated Netherlands by 6 wickets
Man of the Match: Ryan ten Doeschate for scoring a smashing 119 and taking 2 wickets

New Zealand 's Christ Church Earth Quake


New Zealand's Christchurch weathered a 7.0 earthquake, but a smaller 6.3 aftershock toppled buildings and killed scores largely because it was a ‘bullseye' direct hit, scientists said.

Very shallow

Tuesday's cataclysmic tremor, which left nearly 400 people dead or missing and the city centre in ruins, was so close to the city of 390,000 and so shallow that major damage was inevitable, they said.

“This quake was pretty much a bullseye,” said Professor John Wilson, deputy dean of engineering at Australia's Swinburne University of Technology.

“It was quite a large 6.3-magnitude event and so close to Christchurch that we weren't surprised to see significant damage. At that close range, the level of shaking is quite severe.”

The earthquake struck six months after the violent 7.0 tremor damaged 100,000 buildings and left a major repair bill, but caused no deaths, after striking overnight on September 4.

“Tuesday's quake is by far the largest earthquake to have occurred in the Christchurch region in historic time,” Melbourne University research fellow Gary Gibson said in a release from the Australian Science Media Centre.

“Earthquakes always cluster in time and space, with some large earthquakes having foreshocks and most large earthquakes have many aftershocks.” Gibson said authorities should not be faulted for not anticipating the quake.

Gibson, however, said Christchurch would always be prone to damaging quakes, saying “all earthquakes in the Christchurch region will be shallow, so the effect of a given earthquake will be worse than from a deeper plate boundary earthquake of the same magnitude.”

Newer office blocks such as the CTV and Pyne Gould buildings collapsed. “We expected the older buildings with unreinforced masonry to suffer — their masonry is heavy, brittle and vulnerable to earthquake shaking,” Wilson said.

“In general the contemporary buildings performed well, although a few contemporary buildings have collapsed, which did surprise us.”

David Rothery, of the Volcano Dynamics Group at Britain's Open University, said the soft ground on which the city is built would have magnified the shaking, making the 6.3 quake even more deadly.

Flat ground

“In much of Christchurch where the ground is flat and underlain by sand or silt, some structures have been shaken apart, causing upper stories to collapse onto the floors below,” he said.

“This is because soft ground magnifies how violently the surface shakes during an earthquake.” Australian Seismological Centre director Kevin McCue said the tremor could increase pressure on plate boundaries across New Zealand, increasing the likelihood of a tremor elsewhere, particularly in the capital Wellington.

“If you have one (quake) it ups the hazard,” he told the New Zealand Herald.

“This quake has the potential to load up the plate boundary, increasing the likelihood of a quake at Wellington.”

“Wellington has always been considered much more at risk because it straddles the plate boundary. New Zealand has been relatively quiet since the 1930s — maybe (it's) about to catch up.”

New Zealand sits on the ‘Pacific Ring of Fire', a vast zone of seismic and volcanic activity stretching from Chile on one side to Japan and Indonesia on the other.

But Gibson feels that “the September earthquake and this earthquake will have relieved the majority of stress in the regions in which they occurred so another large earthquake is unlikely.”

Tuesday's quake is the most deadly to hit New Zealand since a 7.8-magnitude tremor killed 256 people in the Hawke's Bay region in 1931.

SOURCE :The hindu

Shuttle Discovery ready for launch


Space shuttle Discovery slowly makes it's way to Launch Pad 39a
at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida.

The space shuttle Discovery is due to make its final flight later this month after a nearly four month delay, the US space agency NASA said Friday.

NASA set lift-off for February 24 at 2150 GMT from Cape Canaveral for an 11-day mission to the International Space Station (ISS).

The flight was to have taken place in October before being delayed several times after technicians discovered cracks in the shuttle’s external fuel tank.

The mission will deliver the last major U.S. contribution to the ISS - an extra room - along with supplies, including a human-like robot, known as Robonaut 2 (R2), the first-such robot ever sent to space.

The oldest vehicle in the operating space shuttle fleet, Discovery entered construction in 1979 and blasted off into space for the first time in 1984.

The shuttle fleet is due to be retired later this year, with one and possibly two flights after Discovery lands.

1961 Soviet space capsule for sale

Vostok 3KA-2 space capsule, flown with the cosmonaut-mannequin Ivan Ivanovich on
March 25, 1961, as the final test mission prior to Yuri Gagarin's first manned space flight.

The capsule, scorched during its re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere, is estimated to sell for between $2 million and $10 million at Sotheby’s.

Just weeks before the first man shot into outer space in 1961, the Soviets launched a dress rehearsal with a duplicate of the space capsule carrying a cosmonaut mannequin and a live dog.

The Vostok 3KA-2 spacecraft - a twin of the Vostok 3KA-3 that later carried cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin - is being auctioned in New York on April 12, the 50th anniversary of the manned mission.

The capsule, scorched during its re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere, was to go on exhibit at the Sotheby’s auction house galleries on Thursday. It’s estimated to sell for between $2 million and $10 million.

Sotheby’s said the owner, who wished to remain anonymous, bought it privately from the Russians years ago and felt the 50th anniversary was an appropriate time to sell it.

The capsule’s interior, which contained about 1,800 pounds (815 kilograms) of instrumentation, has been stripped for security reasons. Made of aluminium alloy and measuring a little more than 7 feet (2.1 meters) in diameter, it retained “secret” classification until 1986.

The life-size space-suited mannequin, nicknamed Ivan Ivanovich, has been on loan at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington since 1997. It was bought at Sotheby’s by the Perot Foundation in 1993.

The faux astronaut shared the small capsule with a mutt named Zvezdochka, or Little Star, which made it back from space safely.

The test mission made one low Earth orbit before its re-entry 115 minutes later and landing in a snow-covered gully near Izhevsk, an industrial city in what’s now the European part of Russia.

Just 18 days later, the 3KA-3 manned capsule, later renamed Vostok 1, carried Gagarin on the world’s first space flight. Like the mannequin, Gagarin was ejected from the capsule and parachuted down.

The Vostok 1 is now housed in the Rkk Energia Museum near Moscow.

The first manned space flight came four years after the launch of Sputnik, the first manmade satellite.

19 February 2011

Bangladesh v India-Cricket WC


In a city that can't get enough of cricket or cricketers, Virender Sehwag set the World Cup alight on its opening day with an innings of such clarity and cricketing acumen that even a spirited showing from Bangladesh could not deny India.
At just after 2.30pm local time, the 25,000-strong crowd at the immaculate Sher E Bangla cricket stadium exhaled as one, when Sehwag took early aim at medium pacer Shafiul Islam and drilled a boundary through extra cover.
But, having begun in now customary fashion, Sehwag soon realised why Bangladesh skipper Shakib Al Hasan had put India in to bat when he had the choice. The dark brown clay that is native to the suburb of Mirpur had robbed the pitch of any real bounce, and with Bangladesh's bowlers taking the pace off the ball, strokemaking was anything but easy.
That India overcame the conditions in such an emphatic manner to reach 370-4, a score that would prove 87 runs too many for Bangladesh, despite a counter-punching 70 from Tamim Iqbal, was testament to Sehwag's nous and the purity of Virat Kohli's strokeplay.
After beginning with a boundary, Sehwag was forced to rein himself in, unable to trust the bounce and pace of the ball coming off the pitch.
In Sachin Tendulkar's company, Sehwag decided to take a long, hard look at the pitch, and played himself in rather than attacking continuously.
A master of summing up situations, Tendulkar was poised ominously when an unusually careless piece of running resulted in him being stranded at the non-striker's end along with Sehwag, who had barely left his crease after the ball was played to mid-on.
Sehwag switched gears in Gautam Gambhir's company, chipping over the infield and carving the ball into gaps, focusing hard on picking up ones and twos.
Gambhir shimmied down the pitch repeatedly to the spinners without looking for the big shot, instead placing the ball into vacant spaces and pushing his partner to run hard. That Sehwag reached his century only in the 32nd over, and would eventually end with 79 runs from ones and twos, tells you how much he strayed from his favoured style of play.
When Gambhir played around an innocuous delivery from off-spinner Mahmdullah that kept a touch low, the all-Delhi batting partnership was kept intact as Kohli joined Sehwag.
India's most improved cricketer in recent times, Kohli, who has a mature head on 22-year-old shoulders, brought to the fore the self belief that separates the best cricketers from the rest.
On a day when Sehwag threatened the 200-mark before falling to a tired stroke on 175, it was understandable that Kohli's century was overshadowed. But the first Indian to score a hundred on World Cup debut won't mind that, as his future in Indian cricket appears secure.
What Sehwag and Kohli did in the course of their 203-run third-wicket association, was show the other teams in their group, especially the likes of England and South Africa, whose traditional strengths aren't ideally suited to subcontinental conditions, just what kind of approach was most likely to work in this tournament.
On slow pitches, with the accent on spin, batsmen must be both willing to use their feet and possess the requisite skill of choosing shots wisely if they are to succeed.
With India putting a mammoth score on the board, Bangladesh's batsmen had a task on their hands, and even a couple of years ago would have been dismissed cheaply, playing too many shots. But this team has come a long way, and after a performance like this it's easy to see why there's such passion for the game in the country.
From the time you step out of the airport, you're constantly reminded that the World Cup is in town, and when the opening ceremony got under way, there were at least as many people partying on the streets outside the Bangabandhu Stadium as there were in the stands.
On Saturday, a fan held a banner that read: “Waka, waka, this time for Dhaka,” and the point was well made. If cricket can ever come close to matching the kind of mania that football inspires, it's here in Dhaka. If the 50-over World Cup needed a boost, it couldn't have asked for a better one than it got.

17 February 2011

Bryan Adams headline the 2011 World Cup's opening ceremony


The World Cup gets under way with an opening ceremony at Bangabandhu National Stadium in Dhaka, to be described no doubt as "glittering", the like and extravagance of which will not have been seen in Bangladesh before. Apparently among others more appropriate to the hosts, it is to be headlined by the rock star Bryan Adams, whose anthem Summer Of '69, may not be a eulogy to the time he got his first real six-string (he would have been nine when Jimmy quit the band they formed at school and Jody got married) so much as a celebration of Yorkshire winning the seven-year-old Gillette Cup and Lancashire taking the inaugural 40-over Sunday League title. Limited overs cricket has come on a bit since the best days of his life.
Alas, I shan't be there to witness these ceremonials. Actually I'm not a bit sorry because although I did enjoy a few – such as that which preceded the 2007 World Cup, the best part of the whole event – I have an aversion to opening ceremonies, particularly those at sporting events in which enormous sums of money are spent on what is little more than an exercise in willy-waving.
The lighting of the Olympic flame cuts the mustard, of course, but that is genuinely iconic. But not the choreography, special effects, lasers, fireworks and showbiz stars that are deemed de rigueur for any large tournament. It is unfair to equate the millions spent on these excesses with schools or hospitals not built for lack of funds, but legitimate to query whether money might better be spent on sporting facilities (two grand will buy an artificial cricket pitch in Afghanistan, as Guardian readers will know) rather than, say, Mr Adams, however highly he might be revered in that part of the world.
And you don't pitch up to a sporting occasion to hear your national anthem sung by Christina Aguilera in a manner that makes fingernails on a blackboard seem a pleasure.
Maybe it is because of the fact that by and large cricket, operating on smaller budgets, tends to do these things so ineptly by comparison. This is the 10th edition of cricket's World Cup and I'm not sure any prelude has progressed entirely without hitch. For the first three, all in England, hazy memory suggests nothing specific beyond a speech or two in front of the assembled teams, which means that the first real attempt at a spectacular was in India in 1987.
This, I recall well enough for it took place at a Delhi hockey stadium. The teams were lined up in the arena and then marched up into the back of a stand where, in the shadows, they shook hands with someone who may or may not have been Rajiv Ghandi who, not without good reason as it transpired four years later, was under the strictest security.
The symbolic (apparently) release of hundreds of white balloons followed and this did not go well. They were contained in a line of cages of a kind that once would have been used for mailbags on a station platform, and from the outset something was not quite right. We twigged: they were all skulking at the bottom of the cages rather than bursting to get out. Someone had puffed them up with a hand pump so when released they skittered in the breeze along the ground.
Those who recall the scene in that year's television adaptation of Porterhouse Blue, where David Jason's college porter Skullion is seen manically stamping on hundreds of inflated condoms in the college grounds, can picture the scene that followed. Now that was entertainment.
Australia 1992 was mercifully free of ceremony, and it took the 1996 opener at Eden Gardens to redress the balance, where the $3m Son et lumière laser show (I think Jean Michel Jarre may have collaborated) had not catered for a strong wind billowing the huge, filmy-fabric projection screen like the sails on the Cutty Sark. It was so humiliating there was talk of Jagmohan Dalmiya, head of Bengal Cricket Association, being prosecuted for misappropriation of public funds.
By 2003 things were back on track with a cut-price $2m buying an uneventful few hours of entertainment at Newlands. Truth be known it needed it, for the nadir of opening ceremonies, the absolute pits, the apotheosis of ineptness, had been reached in England in 1999, where a budget that would not have kept a family of four in food for a week bought a box of Brocks fireworks, and Tony Blair claiming to have seen things that never actually happened. If only we could have recognised that trait for what it was at the time.

Openning Ceremony Of Cricket World Cup 2011 in Dhaka


Australia's captain, Ricky Ponting, rides on a rickshaw during
the 2011 Cricket World Cup opening ceremony in Dhaka.
The Bangbandhu Stadium, bang in the middle of Dhaka and now the home of the national football team, was crammed full four hours before the rock singer Bryan Adams began clearing his throat.
Outside there were thousands in the streets looking on and pining to be part of the official opening party of the World Cup. Perhaps they might catch a glimpse of the 14 captains, all of whom had gathered earlier in Bangladesh's capital for a group press conference, which lasted 10 minutes. Daniel Vettori, as articulate as any international cricketer on the circuit, was not required to utter a word.
The captains were not borne to the ceremony in rickshaws, of which there are supposed to be a quarter of a million in the city. But they were paraded around the locals' favourite stadium in the vehicle that is still synonymous with Dhaka.
The imperfections of the format of this World Cup are plain and well-publicised, but there was no denying the fervour of the locals at an enchanting opening ceremony. Since all the qualifying matches to be played in Dhaka and Chittagong involve Bangladesh that fervour is unlikely to be dampened in the next month (weather permitting).
For Dhaka this is all supposed to mirror the experience of Colombo in 1996. Then the Sri Lankans were the junior hosts and in some ways they experienced more heartache than is likely in Bangladesh in the next few weeks. Several fixtures never took place in Colombo in 1996 because of the security concerns. No matter; there was ample compensation as Sri Lanka went on to win that tournament.
Bangladesh may not have that kind of cream at the top of their cricketing churn, but the vast numbers captivated by the game here suggest that they will get there. They could still win a World Cup before England.
Certainly they knew how to celebrate the start of this one. Darkness descended upon Dhaka; Bangladesh's national anthem was gracefully sung and then we were invited to "unleash the spirit of cricket across the world", which was not an invitation to bet on the precise duration of the opening ceremony. Cue fireworks (rather more effective and expensive than the ones acquired by the England and Wales Cricket Board at Lord's in 1999) and a 21st-century musical amalgam accompanied by a cast of flag-waving thousands, expertly choreographed.
Enter Stumpy, the mascot – an elephant – drawn along by a bicycle rickshaw.
Ho, hum. Then came the captains on their rickshaws. Ben-Hur it was not but it was quite a spectacle and the roar that greeted Bangladesh's Shakib Al Hasan shook the stands. For those who believe in omens, Graeme Smith's rickshaw almost conked out and had to receive repairs before his circuit was completed. Which either means that South Africa are bound to struggle in this tournament – or they will win it for the first time.
Five speeches failed to stifle the fervour. There followed illuminated kites flickering across the night sky and an ingenious display from abseilers on a nearby high-rise building. By now we could hear only the crowd. Indeed one of the advantages of a tournament that is played mostly under floodlights may be that we will not be able to spot the emptiness of any stadium throughout the second half of the match.
There was more vigorous, impeccably arranged, multicoloured dancing, the like of which would do Samit Patel no harm at all. Finally we were introduced to Adams. He hails from Canada, who have had a lively few days in Bangladesh. The most lowly of the underdogs almost embarrassed England in a practice match. Now one of their finest sons held the stage – in 20th-century style – for 11 minutes just before the close of a ceremony, which finished almost on schedule, another good omen.
So all was peace and much spectacular light in Dhaka. Nervously we wait to see whether there will be more of the unpredictable intrusions that have bedevilled recent tournaments. Everything is set. On Friday England play their final pre-tournament fixture, a friendly against Pakistan, if there is such a thing, at Fatullah, a suburb of Dhaka. A modest crowd is anticipated. On Saturday the competition is launched in Mirpur when Bangladesh take on India and is a sell-out. The country will be at a standstill until that game is over.

07 February 2011

Google’s new art project offers HD museum tours

A screenshot of Google's Art Project website.

Google has come up with the next best thing to visiting the world’s greatest museums — high-definition virtual art tours that use powerful cameras to zoom into some of the most famous masterpieces in history.

The Google Art Project was announced Tuesday and uses technology adapted from the company’s Street View feature to allow web browsers to wander the halls of 17 leading museums around the world.

The most prominent works on show, numbering about 1,000 in all, can be viewed in ultra-high definition, allowing users to zoom in to see the smallest of brush strokes and cracks in the canvas. Each picture is accompanied by explanatory text.

The institutions on show include the Metropolitan Museum of Art and MoMA in New York, the State Hermitage Museum in St Petersburg, Tate Britain and the National Gallery in London, Museo Reina Sofia in Madrid, the Uffizi Gallery in Florence and the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam. Among the works available for ultra close-up viewing are Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, Cezanne’s Bathers and Van Gogh’s The Bedroom.

“It started when a small group of us who were passionate about art got together to think about how we might use our technology to help museums make their art more accessible,” said Amit Sood, head of Google Art Project, “not just to regular museum-goers or those fortunate to have great galleries on their doorsteps, but to a whole new set of people who might otherwise never get to see the real thing up close.”

Android ‘Honeycomb' challenges Apple's iPad


Earlier this week, Google unveiled its Android 3.0 operating system code-named ‘Honeycomb.' It has since received positive buzz across online geek forums for what many see as the open source operating system that will help Android Tablet PCs challenge Apple's iPad, the undisputed market leader now, which runs on its proprietary operating system.

Technology writers, who were invited to the Google headquarters at Mountain View, California, on February 2, were among the first to get an in-depth view of Android's Honeycomb eco-system. It has come across as operating system built from scratch with the new form factor of tablet PCs in mind. Most of the widely followed technology blogs have already given it their thumbs-up.

The first of the tablet PCs sporting Honeycomb, Motorola's Xoom, is expected to hit the retail markets soon.

Huge leap

The predominant verdict is that not only has Honeycomb been a huge leap over the previous versions of Android OS, which, to be fair, have been designed for smartphones running on much lower specifications. It also comes across as a good introduction to the Android ecosystem, in ease of use. It also supports multi-tasking, among many other new experiences.

Hardware specifications

The new OS also seems to have been designed keeping in mind the advanced hardware specifications that most Android tablet PCs set to hit the markets world over through the year are expected to sport. Motorola's Xoom tablet PC, previewed at the CES event in Vegas last month, is one such device with fairly advanced specifications: it has a dual core processor as its CPU and full HD support. In many ways, Honeycomb is seen as the OS that would help the Android tablets compete with the next version of iPad.

In-built GPUs

Thanks to a host of next-generation processors that are both capable and low-power consuming, most tablets are expected to have in-built GPUs (graphic processor units) in addition to the CPU. Android Honeycomb has ‘renderscript' for hardware accelerated-3D animation that makes the user experience smooth. This has made it possible for the desktop to have a 3D effect and features the ‘flip experience' that many users have got used to in the Apple ecosystem. Serious geeks will know that such effects have long existed in the Linux ecosystem.At this point, it is still not officially clear whether Honeycomb will also have a separate OS for smartphones. There is speculation that there could be one with a different user-interface as it could allow ‘syncing' without any drastic change in the look and the feel.

Bigger numbers

By virtue of being open source, Honeycomb is most likely to have bigger numbers in terms of deployment because of the number of vendors backing it. But it is still not exactly a two-horse race between Apple's proprietary OS and Android's Honeycomb. Blackberry's Playbook tablet PC, which runs its own OS and is set to hit the markets soon, has received good press so far. This could be the first year of an all-out battle of the tablet PCs.

Ericsson launches mobile money services


Telecom equipment maker Ericsson Thursday launched mobile money services to offer mobile financial services in cooperation with its operator customers and players in the financial sectors.

?A new market is opening up consisting of consumers whose first meeting with banks will take place over a mobile phone and who may never own a plastic credit card. They will also benefit from more reasonable fees for routine transactions such as transferring funds,? said Semir Mahjoub, head of Ericsson Money Services.

With mobile payments and person-to-person money transfers forecast to become some of the most-used mobile applications in many countries in the next two or three years, mobile money will become a foundation for person-to-machine and machine-to-machine connections by 2020.

The launch of this new business follows two years of thorough preparation and proof of concept in Europe and Asia, the company said in a statement.

Dell releases two new smartphones in India


Setting its sight firmly on the high-end smartphone market, PC manufacturer Dell on Thursday released two new smartphones — the Android-powered Dell Venue and its first Microsoft Windows 7 phone, Venue Pro. While one-touch phone Venue, which runs on Android 2.2, is priced at Rs.29,990, the Venue Pro, a stylish vertical slide phone with QWERTY keypad that comes bundled with XBOX Pro and other Windows applications, is priced at Rs.34,990. Both sporting 4.1 inch screens are available on all GSM networks with special offers and privileges for Aircel users.

Announcing the ‘preferred partnership' with Dell, Chief Operations Officer of Aircel Gurdeep Singh said the company was all set to launch 3G. “We will launch 3G in a few weeks. Our 3G network will be out there before the World Cup starts,” he hinted. Mr Singh said that the company was in a ‘strong position' and smart devices were at the heart of the company's growth strategy. Both phones run on 1 Gigahertz Qualcomm processors. The camera on Venue Pro offers a lower resolution of five megapixels, while the Android-phone camera is eight megapixels. Both come preloaded with the ‘Dell Stage' user interface that aims at facilitating a richer user experience. Stage displays music, photos, and is feature-rich, said Dell India Executive Director and General Manager (Consumer and SMB) Mahesh Bhalla.

On the decision to opt for the Windows 7 operating system, at a time when Android appears to be ruling the roost, Mr. Bhalla said: “Microsoft is a great partner. Our servers and networks work on Microsoft, so it is natural for us to have devices on the same platform.” He said this was a significant day in the journey of Dell India which started its journey in the small-screen smartphone segment only a few months ago.

-The Hindu

05 February 2011

Black money list revealed From Liechtenstein Bank


After two years of debates and controversies the list of eighteen Indians who have stashed ‘black money’ in the LGT bank of Liechtenstein is out.

The list which was officially handed over to the Indian Government on March 18, 2009 includes 12 trusts and 26 beneficiaries.

The list that Germany shared with India had 12 trusts out of which four belong to Indians. The beneficiaries are

1 . Manoj Dhupelia
2 . Rupal Dhupelia
3 . Mohan Dhupelia
4 . Hasmukh Gandhi
5 . Chintan Gandhi
6 . Dilip Mehta
7 . Arun Mehta
8 . Arun Kochar
9 . Gunwanti Mehta
10. Rajnikant Mehta
11. Prabodh Mehta
12. Ashok Jaipuria
13. Raj Foundation
14. Urvashi Foundation
15. Ambrunova Trust

According to CNN IBN, the amounts in the twelve accounts totals nearly to Rs 52 Crores.

The list has been leaked out of various media houses across the country. However, experts are of the view that this could be a plant – while the real account holders are some where out there.

03 February 2011

40 biggest moneymakers of 2010

A definition: this list is limited to creative figures—stars, directors, producers—and to the money they earn from film. Thus we include no executives or agents, and we don’t count earnings from non-film-related projects, such as Steve Carell’s fees for starring on The Office or Jennifer Aniston’s for appearing in SmartWater ads. We did our best to ascertain a star’s up-front advance for a given film as well as his or her share of the movie’s profits, assuming there were any. (Often, the lion’s share of fees for a 2010 release may have actually been paid in 2009 and thus is not counted in this year’s list.) Worldwide box-office figures were culled from the Web sites Box Office Mojo and Box Office Guru. Revenue figures from DVD sales—for the first three quarters of 2010 anyway—were supplied by Screen Digest; we devised our own revenue estimates for fourth-quarter DVD sales by applying a conservative formula based on a movie’s performance at the box office.

While nine-figure windfalls such as James Cameron’s and Johnny Depp’s are still rare, Hollywood’s post-crash aversion to $20 million paydays and gross-point deals seems to be easing. The fact that a mid-range star such as Vince Vaughn asked for—and got close to—$20 million to appear in The Dilemma proves that the big studios are once again hungering to shell out Goldman-like bonuses for (somewhat) proven commodities. As one studio executive put it, “We’re not trying to commit felonies here, just a few misdemeanors.”


40. Eddie Murphy
ACTOR (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $13 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$7.5 million: Tower Heist (fee for co-starring in action comedy with Ben Stiller)
$4 million: Shrek Forever After (back-end bonus)
$1.5 million: Older film revenue


39. Guy Ritchie
DIRECTOR (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $13.5 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$7.5 million: Fee for directing untitled Sherlock Holmes sequel
$6 million: Sherlock Holmes (back-end for directing, based on worldwide gross of $523 million, and share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)


38. Shawn Levy
DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $14 MILLION (2009 rank: 26)
$10 million: Real Steel (fee for directing and producing upcoming robotic action film starring Hugh Jackman)
$4 million: Older film revenue, mostly from the Night at the Museum franchise


37. Hugh Jackman
ACTOR (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $14 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$9 million: Real Steel (fee for starring in upcoming Shawn Levy movie)
$2 million: Butter (fee for starring in upcoming Weinstein Co. film)
$1.5 million: Snow Flower and the Secret Fan (fee for starring in small art-house film)
$1.5 million: Older film revenue


36. Reese Witherspoon
ACTRESS (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $14.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 31)
$12 million: This Means War (fee for starring in upcoming romantic comedy directed by McG)
$2 million: Water for Elephants (fee for co-starring in upcoming drama with Robert Pattinson)
$500,000: Older film revenue


35. Tom Cruise
ACTOR, PRODUCER, WRITER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $14.5 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$12.5 million: Mission: Impossible—Ghost Protocol (fee for writing, producing, and starring in upcoming fourth M.I. movie)
$2 million: Older film revenue


34. Shia LaBeouf
ACTOR (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $16 MILLION (2009 rank: 39)
$15 million: Transformers: Dark of the Moon (fee for starring in Michael Bay’s upcoming, third Transformers movie)
$1 million: Older film revenue


33. Katherine Heigl
ACTRESS, PRODUCER (Paradigm)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $16 MILLION (2009 rank: 25)
$15 million: One for the Money (fee for producing and starring in upcoming romantic cop comedy)
$1 million: Older film revenue


32. Martin Scorsese
DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $17 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$10 million: Hugo Cabret (fee for directing and producing upcoming 3-D adventure film starring Sacha Baron Cohen)
$3.5 million: Shutter Island (back-end for directing and producing, based on worldwide gross of $295 million, and share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$3.5 million: Older film revenue


31. Steve Carell
ACTOR, PRODUCER (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $17.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 22)
$15 million: Crazy, Stupid, Love (fee for starring in and producing upcoming romantic comedy)
$2.5 million: Older film revenue


30. Ben Stiller
ACTOR, PRODUCER (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $18 MILLION (2009 rank: 7)
$15 million: Tower Heist (fee for starring in upcoming action comedy)
$1 million: The Big Year (fee for producing upcoming Owen Wilson comedy)
$2 million: Older film revenue


29. Vin Diesel
ACTOR, PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $18 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$15 million: Fast Five (fee for producing and starring in upcoming The Fast and the Furious fivequel)
$3 million: Older film revenue


28. Daniel Craig
ACTOR (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $18 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$6 million: Cowboys & Aliens (fee for starring in upcoming Jon Favreau spoof)
$6 million: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (fee for starring in upcoming first installment of inevitable suspense franchise)
$5 million: Dream House (fee for starring in upcoming crime thriller with Naomi Watts)
$1 million: Older film revenue


27. Vince Vaughn
ACTOR (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $18.5 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$17.5 million: The Dilemma (fee for starring)
$1 million: Older film revenue



26. Owen Wilson
ACTOR (United Talent Agency)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $19.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 16)
$8 million: Hall Pass (fee for starring in upcoming Farrelly-brothers comedy)
$8 million: The Big Year (fee for co-starring in upcoming comedy with Jack Black)
$2.5 million: Cars 2 (fee for voice work for upcoming Pixar sequel)
$1 million: Older film revenue


25. Joel Silver
PRODUCER (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $21 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$18 million: Sherlock Holmes (back-end for producing, based on worldwide gross of $523 million, and share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$3 million: Older film revenue


24. Christopher Meledandri
PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $21 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$17.5 million: Despicable Me (back-end for producing, based on worldwide gross of $541 million)
$2.5 million: Hop (fee for producing upcoming animated Easter Bunny story)
$1 million: Older film revenue, mostly from the Ice Age franchise


23. Brian Grazer and Ron Howard
PRODUCER; DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (CAA—Howard)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS, COMBINED:$21 MILLION (2009 rank: 20)
$10 million: The Dilemma (Howard’s fee for directing Vince Vaughn comedy)
$2.5 million: The Dilemma (joint fee for producing)
$2.5 million: Cowboys & Aliens (joint fee for producing)
$2.5 million: Tower Heist (Grazer’s fee for producing upcoming Ben Stiller comedy)
$2.5 million: Older film revenue
$1 million: Robin Hood (Grazer’s share of DVD and pay-TV revenue, for producing)


22. Sandra Bullock
ACTRESS (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $22 MILLION (2009 rank: 34)
$20 million: The Blind Side (back-end, based on worldwide gross of $309 million, plus share of DVD and pay-TV revenue; excludes $15 million earned in 2009)
$2 million: Older film revenue


21. Angelina Jolie
ACTRESS (Media Talent Group)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $23.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 32)
$19 million: The Tourist (fee for co-starring alongside Johnny Depp)
$2.5 million: Fee for writing and directing untitled Bosnian-war drama
$1 million: Kung Fu Panda 2 (fee for voice work in animated DreamWorks sequel)
$1 million: Older film revenue


20. Nicolas Cage
ACTOR (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $23.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 17)
$7.5 million: Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (fee for starring in upcoming supernatural sequel)
$7 million: Trespass (fee for playing an angry husband alongside Nicole Kidman in upcoming thriller)
$6 million: Drive Angry (fee for playing an angry father in upcoming revenge drama)
$1 million: The Croods (fee for voice work in upcoming DreamWorks animated film)
$2 million: Older film revenue


19. Jon Favreau
DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $24 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$12 million: Iron Man 2 (back-end for directing and producing, based on worldwide gross of $627 million, and share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$10 million: Cowboys & Aliens (fee for directing and producing)
$2 million: Older film revenue


18. Jennifer Aniston
ACTRESS (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $24.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 33)
$10 million: Just Go with It (fee for co-starring in Adam Sandler comedy)
$8 million: Wanderlust (fee for starring in upcoming Judd Apatow-produced film)
$6 million: Horrible Bosses (fee for starring in upcoming workplace comedy)
$500,000: Older film revenue


17. Tyler Perry
WRITER, DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $25 MILLION (2009 rank: 11)
$13 million: Why Did I Get Married Too? (back-end for writing, directing, and producing, and share of DVD revenue)
$8 million: I Can Do Bad All by Myself (share of DVD revenue)
$2 million: Precious (share of DVD revenue)
$2 million: Older film revenue


16. Jason Blum and Oren Peli
PRODUCER; WRITER, DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $26.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 27)
$19 million: Paranormal Activity 2 (for producing, based on worldwide gross of $169 million)
$7.5 million: Paranormal Activity (share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)


15. Robert Pattinson
ACTOR (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $27.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 35)
$12.5 million: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn—Part 1 (fee for co-starring)
$12.5 million: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn—Part 2 (fee for co-starring)
$1.5 million: Water for Elephants (fee for starring alongside Reese Witherspoon in upcoming literary adaptation)
$1 million: Fee for starring in upcoming costume drama Bel Ami; older film revenue, mostly from Twilight franchise


14. Jerry Bruckheimer
PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $27.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 10)
$10 million: Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (fee for producing fourth installment of his lucrative Johnny Depp vehicle)
$10 million: Annual first-look production deal with Disney
$7.5 million: Older film revenue


13. Kristen Stewart
ACTRESS (The Gersh Agency)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $28.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 37)
$12.5 million: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn—Part 1 (fee for co-starring)
$12.5 million: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn—Part 2 (fee for co-starring)
$2.5 million: On the Road (fee for starring in long-aborning adaptation of the Jack Kerouac classic)
$1 million: Older film revenue, mostly from Twilight franchise


12. Joe Roth
PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $28.5 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$27.5 million: Alice in Wonderland (back-end for producing, based on worldwide gross of $1.02 billion, and share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$1 million: Older film revenue


11. Will Smith
ACTOR, PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $29 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$20 million: Men in Black III (fee for starring in upcoming franchise resuscitation)
$5.5 million: The Karate Kid (back-end for producing, based on worldwide gross of $358 million, plus share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$3.5 million: Older film revenue


10. Robert Downey Jr.
ACTOR (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $31.5 MILLION (2009 rank: 28)
$15 million: Fee for starring in upcoming untitled Sherlock Holmes sequel
$12 million: Iron Man 2 (back-end, based on worldwide gross of $627 million, and share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$3.5 million: Sherlock Holmes (back-end, based on worldwide gross of $523 million, and share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$1 million: Older film revenue


9. Taylor Lautner
ACTOR (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $33.5 million (2009 rank: —)
$12.5 million: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn—Part 1 (fee for co-starring in upcoming penultimate Twilight film)
$12.5 million: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn—Part 2 (fee for co-starring in upcoming final Twilight film)
$7.5 million: Abduction (fee for starring in upcoming John Singleton thriller)
$1 million: Older film revenue, mostly from Twilight franchise


8. Todd Phillips
WRITER, DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $34 MILLION (2009 rank: 5)
$15 million: The Hangover Part II (fee for writing, producing, and directing)
$13 million: The Hangover (back-end for producing and directing; excludes $39 million earned in 2009)
$3 million: Due Date (back-end for producing and directing, based on worldwide gross of $200 million, as of December 31, 2010)
$2 million: Older film revenue
$1 million: Project X (fee for producing upcoming low-budget comedy)


7. Adam Sandler
ACTOR, PRODUCER, WRITER (WME)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $50 MILLION (2009 rank: 12)
$25 million: Just Go with It (fee for producing and starring in upcoming comedy opposite Jennifer Aniston)
$20 million: Jack and Jill (fee for producing and starring in upcoming comedy with Katie Holmes and Al Pacino)
$3 million: Grown Ups (back-end for starring and writing, based on worldwide gross of $271 million, plus share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$2 million: Older film revenue


6. Tim Burton
DIRECTOR (William Morris Endeavor)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $53 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$50 million: Alice in Wonderland (back-end for directing, based on worldwide gross of $1.02 billion, and share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$3 million: Older film revenue


5. Leonardo DiCaprio
ACTOR (Special Artists Agency)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $62 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$59 million: Inception (back-end for starring in somewhat convoluted Christopher Nolan film)
$3 million: Back-end for starring in somewhat convoluted Martin Scorsese film Shutter Island, older film revenue


4. Christopher Nolan
WRITER, DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $71.5 MILLION (2009 rank: —)
$69 million: Inception (back-end for writing, producing, and directing, based on worldwide gross of $823 million, and share of DVD and pay-TV revenue)
$2.5 million: Older film revenue


3. Steven Spielberg
DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (CAA)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $80 MILLION (2009 rank: 2)
$50 million: Universal-theme-park royalties and consulting fees
$20 million: War Horse (fee for directing and producing upcoming World War I drama)
$10 million: Older film revenue


2. Johnny Depp
ACTOR (United Talent Agency)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $100 MILLION (2009 rank: 21)
$40 million: Alice in Wonderland (back-end for starring in Tim Burton film, based on worldwide gross of $1.02 billion)
$35 million: Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (up-front money for starring in next installment of Jerry Bruckheimer’s waterlogged but ludicrously profitable franchise)
$20 million: The Tourist (fee for co-starring in one of the year’s bigger flops alongside Angelina Jolie)
$5 million: Older film revenue


1. James Cameron
WRITER, DIRECTOR, PRODUCER (Creative Artists Agency)
ESTIMATED 2010 EARNINGS: $257 MILLION (2009 rank: 4)
$248 million: Avatar (back-end for writing, producing, and directing, based on 2010 worldwide box-office gross of $1.95 billion, and share of DVD and pay-television revenue; excludes $50 million earned in 2009)
$5 million: Avatar (share of toy licensing, other revenue)
$4 million: Older film revenue (e.g., back-end and royalties from earlier projects, other payments)